Critical insights from the Aleutian subduction zone
One of the tectonic sources of large earthquakes that USGS has been monitoring is the Aleutian Subduction Zone. It was here that the Chignik earthquake struck – and USGS was ready for a post-earthquake response mission.
Just a couple of years before, three GNSS-A monitoring sites had been set up on the seafloor off Alaska, in the Aleutian subduction zone, by a team of scientists funded by US National Science Foundation (NSF).
Several Wave Glider surveys had been carried by the USGS and Scripps prior to the M8.2 Chignik earthquake, monitoring the position of the sites in about 1,200 m water depth.
Within weeks of the earthquake, USGS had their Wave Glider back out to measure what movement there had been during and shortly after the earthquake.
Despite challenging weather conditions, the mission collected high-fidelity GNSS and acoustic data with eye-opening results.
“The tsunami was modest, but the seismic event was the largest in the US for nearly six decades,” says Ericksen, “so we expected a large movement. But it was incredible to know exactly how much – and that was 1.4 m.” This was a critical insight into the co- and post-seismic movement, helping to understand subduction zone dynamics.”
The big question was, did the Chignik earthquake increase the state of stress and tsunami potential on the up-dip portion of the fault or not?
“The measurements showed that the fault moved 2 – 3 m horizontally in a shallow part of the fault, less than 20 km below the seabed, helping us to understand how stress builds up along the fault and is released in an earthquake,” he says
“These results suggested that the cumulative slip had relieved stress on the shallow portion of the fault and therefore, the Chignik earthquake likely did not increase tsunami potential of the shallow fault.
“It also showed the effectiveness of the GNSS-A technique and the utility of rapid response GNSS-A measurements to better assess tsunami and earthquake hazards in the region.”
Read more about the Chignik data here.