Sonardyne
Support Centre

You know you need an Ultra-Short BaseLine (USBL) system, but which type of system do you need? It might not seem like an easy choice.

You know you need an Ultra-Short BaseLine (USBL) system, but which type of system do you need? It might not seem like an easy choice. This guide will steer you in the right direction, whether you’re looking to track your dive team, position a deep-rated autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV), or provide a safety critical position refence for Dynamic Positioning (DP).

 

At a glance

Which is the best USBL system to meet your needs?

Diver tracking: → Micro-Ranger 2 USBL

UXO survey or inspection ROVs: → Mini-Ranger 2 USBL (+ Gyro USBL if greater accuracy is required)

Deep-water survey or DP operations: → Ranger 2 USBL (+ Gyro USBL 7000/7000+)

AUV or USV fleets: → Mini-Ranger 2 or Ranger 2 with the Marine Robotics Pack

 

Understanding your USBL system needs

Identifying your operational category is the first step to help determine which Ranger 2 system is the optimal fit for you.

Light coastal users

Micro-Ranger 2 is your ideal option if you:

Operate divers, small remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) or towfish
Work in harbours, lakes, rivers or coastal zones
Need a portable, simple system deployable by 1–2 people
Value fast mobilisation over extreme precision

Nearshore operators

Mini-Ranger 2 is your ideal option if you:

Require survey accuracy up to 1,000m water depth
Conduct inspection, unexploded ordnance (UXO) survey, mine counter measures (MCM) or environmental work
Operate from small or mid-sized vessels
Sometimes support AUVs or ROVs and may require acoustic comms

Deep-water / offshore energy / defence users

Ranger 2 is your ideal option if you:

Work in deepwater, for example 1,000–11,000 m water depth
Need survey-grade accuracy with minimal allowable error, supporting deepwater ROV operations
Operate dynamic positioning (DP) vessels or large offshore ships
Track many subsea assets simultaneously
Support construction, drilling or defence operations

AUV / USV / robotic system operators

Micro-Ranger 2, Mini-Ranger 2 or Ranger 2 (with Robotics Pack) is your ideal option if you:

Command or track fleets of AUVs
Need acoustic comms (two-way messaging, mission updates)
Require INS-aiding for long-duration or deep-water missions
Supporting over-the-horizon uncrewed surface vessel (USV)-based data harvesting or robotics operations

Quick comparison: Micro-Ranger 2 vs Mini-Ranger 2 vs Ranger 2

SystemUse case / user typeDepth rangeTracking capabilityAccuracyKey advantages
Micro-Ranger 2 Dive teams, coastal survey, small boats, education/training Shallow water to ~995 m <10 targets sequentially Entry-level 
<5% slant range accuracy 
Extremely portable, rapid deployment, low training burden supports robotics
Mini-Ranger 2 Nearshore operations, UXO survey, inspection teams, mid-range ROV/AUV ~995 m (extendable to 4,000 m) <10 targets, simultaneouslyMid-level 
0.2%–1.3% of slant range accuracy
Excellent balance of capability, portability and price; supports robotics
Ranger 2Offshore energy, deep-water survey, DP vessels, defence, construction ~11,000 m <99 targets, simultaneouslyHighest 
0.04% of slant range accuracy 
Survey-grade precision, DP support, multi-vehicle control, deep-water resilience; supports robotics

Micro-Ranger 2

Best for: Coastal users, diver tracking, training teams, universities

  • Simple, portable, entry-level “plug-and-play” USBL system
  • Fast mobilisation; minimal calibration
  • Ideal for light, irregular or seasonal tasks
  • Fits in a single case; deployable from a small boat or jetty

Mini-Ranger 2

Best for: UXO survey teams, MCM, nearshore contractors, inspection-class ROVs, small AUV ops

  • Higher tracking performance than Micro-Ranger 2, but still portable
  • Tracks multiple vehicles simultaneously improving update rate
  • Can support AUV command-and-control
  • Perfect for recurring commercial operations requiring reliability

Ranger 2

Best for: Offshore survey, deep-water construction, DP vessels, energy operators, defence

  • Ultimate survey-grade precision and range in all water depths
  • Designed for multi-asset tracking on large vessels
  • DP reference integration
  • Supports hundreds of operational scenarios, from construction survey to full ocean depth scientific research and naval defence operations.

Optional add-ons

Gyro USBL transceiver: Improves accuracy by combining USBL and AHRS/INS in one unit.

Who needs it:

Surveyors
DP operators
USV operators
Deep-water specialists

Benefits:

No need for a calibration
Removes alignment and mounting pole-bend errors
Speeds up vessel mobilisation
Enhances accuracy in noisy or dynamic environments

Marine Robotics Pack: Upgrades Micro-Ranger 2, Mini-Ranger 2 and Ranger 2 for advanced robotics.

Who needs it:

AUV/USV operators
Research robotics teams
Long-range autonomous missions

Benefits:

Two-way acoustic messaging
Vehicle tasking and mission commands
INS aiding for reduced drift
Multi-vehicle control (swarming, fleet operations)

TL;DR: Which USBL system do I need?

Quick self-assessment:

Choose Micro-Ranger 2 if you:

  • Track divers or small ROVs in shallow water
  • Work in harbours, lakes or coastal areas
  • Need something portable that fits in one case
  • Want simple setup by 1-2 people
  • Don’t need pinpoint accuracy

Choose Mini-Ranger 2 if you:

  • Do inspection work, UXO surveys or environmental monitoring
  • Operate from small/mid-sized boats
  • Need to track multiple vehicles at once
  • Sometimes work with ROVs or AUVs
  • Want better accuracy without breaking the bank

Choose Ranger 2 if you:

  • Work in deep water (2,000+ metres)
  • Need survey-grade precision for your data
  • Operate from large vessels with dynamic positioning
  • Track many subsea assets simultaneously
  • Work on offshore construction, energy or defence projects

Consider adding:

  • Gyro USBL if you need better accuracy or work from moving vessels
  • Marine Robotics Pack if you operate autonomous vehicles and need to send them commands underwater

Bottom line: Think about your depth, accuracy needs and how portable you need the system to be. Start with Micro if you’re coastal and casual, Mini if you’re a professional nearshore operator and Ranger if you’re going deep or need the best precision.

Cutting through the jargon!

If you’re not sure what some of the terms mean in our guide, here is a helpful summary.

Term/acronym Full form/meaning Explanation 
USBL Ultra-Short BaseLine An underwater acoustic positioning system that uses a tightly clustered array of hydrophones to calculate range and direction to underwater transponders 
AUV Autonomous underwater vehicle A robot that travels underwater without requiring real-time input from an operator; operates independently 
Hydrophones – Underwater microphones that detect sound waves in water 
Transceiver Transmitter-receiver A device that can both transmit and receive signals 
Transponder Transmitter-responder A device that receives a signal and automatically transmits a response 
ROV Remotely operated vehicle An underwater robot controlled by operators on the surface via a cable 
Towfish – A towed underwater device, typically used for surveying 
UXO Unexploded ordnance Military munitions (bombs, shells, mines) that failed to detonate and remain dangerous 
MCM Mine counter measures Military operations to detect, identify and neutralise naval mines 
DP Dynamic positioning A computer-controlled system that automatically maintains a vessel’s position and heading using thrusters 
USV Uncrewed surface vessel An autonomous or remotely operated boat that operates on the water surface without crew onboard 
INS Inertial navigation system A navigation system that uses motion sensors and rotation sensors to calculate position without external references 
AHRS Attitude and heading reference system A system that provides orientation information (pitch, roll, yaw) for vehicles 
Slant range – The direct line-of-sight distance between two points at different depths (not horizontal distance) 
Acoustic comms Acoustic communications Underwater communication using sound waves rather than radio waves 
INS-aiding – Providing corrections to an inertial navigation system to reduce accumulated position errors (drift) 
Pole-bend errors – Positioning errors caused by flexing or bending of the mounting pole/structure supporting the USBL transceiver 

Understanding the differences between jamming and spoofing is essential when dealing with security and interference in maritime communication and navigation systems. Both are forms of interference, but they work in fundamentally separate ways with distinct threats.

What is jamming? 

Jamming is the intentional disruption of signals by overwhelming a communication frequency with noise or other signals. This prevents devices, like navigation systems, from properly receiving and transmitting data. It can disrupt satellite signals, affecting a ship’s ability to determine its position, speed or course.  

It can also prevent a vessel’s position from being transmitted during an emergency distress call over marine VHF radio and can interfere with radar systems used for navigation, collision avoidance and weather monitoring. 

Jamming is considered a brute force attack targeting availability, aiming to deny service rather than manipulate data. 

What is spoofing? 

Spoofing is when someone tricks a system by sending fake signals. This makes the system show the wrong location or act incorrectly. For example, in GNSS spoofing, false signals can fool navigation systems into thinking they are somewhere they are not. This can cause navigation errors or confusion. Spoofing can also disrupt the timing system on a vessel, now heavily relied on in many marine systems. 

Unlike jamming, spoofing needs advanced skills and knowledge of the system being targeted.

Key differences

Aspect Spoofing Jamming 
Method:Generates fake signals to deceive Overwhelms signals with noise 
Objective:Misleads or manipulates systemsDenies service or communication
Complexity:Requires specialist knowledge Simpler, brute force approach 
Target:Data integrity and trust Communication availability 

A real-world challenge

Over the past year, ships have been significantly impacted by AIS and GNSS spoofing incidents in multiple regions.

In the Baltic Sea, vessels have falsely reported positions to obscure port visits, while in the Sea of Japan, tankers involved in Russian oil transport have shown manipulated tracks and false AIS data.

In the Red Sea and Strait of Hormuz, widespread GNSS interference has caused erratic vessel movements and positional jumps.

One of the most striking incidents occurred near Crimea, where dozens of ships appeared to transmit AIS positions placing them inland at airports.

These spoofing events have led to major discrepancies between actual and reported vessel locations, sometimes displacing ships by tens or even hundreds of kilometers.

Defending against jamming and spoofing: The role of SPRINT-DP

When it comes to critical offshore operations such as surveys, pipe laying and construction, reliable positioning is essential. SPRINT-Nav DP is your defence against both jamming and spoofing threats.

By integrating advanced inertial navigation with multiple sensor inputs, SPRINT-Nav DP provides accurate, resilient positioning even if GNSS signals are compromised. Its ability to detect and reject falsified signals, maintain situational awareness during signal loss and seamlessly switch between navigation modes ensures continuous and trustworthy operations.

For operators in tough environments, SPRINT-Nav DP is your go-to for keeping things steady—protecting your assets, crews and missions from the constant challenges of jamming and spoofing.

Watch: What is SPRINT-Nav DP?

Underwater Defence Technology conference

In the following article, Justin Hains, Business Development Manager from Forcys Ltd, describes how using an underwater acoustic network like Sonardyne’s DiveTrack can provide significant operational and safety benefits to diving operations.

Underwater acoustic wireless network for diving operations