Author: Rolf Christensen, INS Manager

For a number of operations, getting survey and positioning sensors as close to the seafloor as possible is important. But, this leads to special requirements for sensor and vehicle design and an increase in operational complexity.  Mounting the Doppler Velocity Log (DVL) with an unobstructed downward view, to achieve bottom lock, can become particularly difficult.

In pipeline inspection operations, for example, it’s preferable to get the vehicle as close to the seabed – and the pipeline it’s inspecting – as possible. But, this can cause the DVL’s bottom lock to be compromised, due to being too close to the seabed.

When operating ploughs or trenchers, most mounting options – eg. pointing the DVL directly towards the seabed, as is commonly done – would compromise the DVL’s accuracy, due to the highly turbid water created by the vehicle it’s mounted on and the DVL beams being reflected or blocked by the trencher or plough itself.

One option, in these applications, is to separate the DVL from the inertial navigation system (INS). This allows more flexibility in terms of where the DVL is mounted. However, this can also drastically impact navigational accuracy, as it introduces lever arm and mounting angle errors between the INS and the DVL. Furthermore, performing DVL INS calibrations are often impossible or very impractical on vehicles such as ploughs and trenchers, as vehicle manoeuvrability is not suitable for calibration purposes.

What is required is a solution for DVL mounting that provides more flexibility on integration without compromising on performance.

The Solution

Sprint-Nav 500When mounting a DVL, one of the limitations is that optimal performance often requires the DVL to be mounted vertically. Our SPRINT-Nav – a compact INS and DVL in one – removes this limitation as it can be mounted at an angle, avoiding turbidity or the vehicle’s own infrastructure, which would otherwise interrupt its DVL beams.

The SPRINT-Nav can do this because the DVL it contains is tightly integrated at beam level, which means each individual DVL beam is fed directly into the INS solution, instead of feeding in a 3D velocity solution resolved by the DVL itself. This low-level integration means that SPRINT-Nav does not rely on the DVL itself to resolve a 3D velocity solution – it is handled more optimally by the INS. This results in the SPRINT-Nav being less constrained and, critically, means that the user can mount the SPRINT-Nav at an angle, without compromising accuracy.

Ploughing Example 

The idea of mounting the SPRINT-Nav at an angle was initially raised during a meeting with offshore survey solution provider UTEC. The concept instantly sparked great interest, as it had not previously been possible with existing INS solutions.

It did not take long to find a suitable cable lay operation that could be used to test and evaluate how an alternative SPRINT-Nav mounting arrangement would perform for this specific application. The operation chosen for the evaluation was a cable lay project in the East Anglia ONE offshore wind farm, in the UK’s southern North Sea. There, UTEC was working from DeepOcean’s Maersk Connector cable lay vessel, providing positioning of DeepOcean’s plough during simultaneous lay and trench of a cable. UTEC’s objective was to get an accurate INS/DVL based position for the plough in order to replace the USBL positioning which was degraded by acoustic noise from the vessel thrusters.

The project included both shallow and deeper water operations, with the following considerations:

  • Highly turbid water
  • Changing altitude, due to varying ploughing depth and sand waves
  • Slow speed (<0.5 knots)
  • A high level of vibration
  • Varying speeds, as the plough moves through the seabed
  • Intermittent and noisy USBL updates, due to environmental factors, long layback tracking and vessel thrust due to towing operations

All-in-all, it was a very tough application, in a very demanding environment – for both the inertial solution and the acoustics. However, we were confident that SPRINT-Nav would perform well, despite the challenges it faced, due to the following:

  • The ring laser gyro (RLG) technology used within SPRINT-Nav is almost immune to vibration; this is not the case for other competing gyro technologies.
  • Tight beam-level DVL aiding increases robustness, even if the DVL loses bottom track periodically or loses individual beams.
  • The pre-calibrated SPRINT-Nav does not rely on any additional calibrations or fine-tuning of parameters during operation to ensure performance.
  • The robustness of the SPRINT-Nav solution makes it less dependent on regular USBL updates.


Specifically, for this project, we proposed to mount the SPRINT-Nav on the side of the plough at a 30° angle, as illustrated.

This mounting arrangement had two benefits. One, the SPRINT-Nav would always have four DVL beam returns as opposed to mounting it vertically, which would cause at least one of the beams to bounce off the plough’s infrastructure. Two, three out of four DVL beams would be directed away from the most turbid water surrounding the plough, improving the signal-to-noise ratio and providing a more robust INS solution.

For this project, we manufactured a bespoke mount, which could be used to adjust pitch and yaw angles, in case any adjustment had to be made during testing. Furthermore, post-processing in our Janus software was proposed, which would deliver the most accurate as-laid cable data.

Ploughing Job

The cable lay project was divided in three parts: integration and mobilisation; shallow water shake-down; and ploughing. A Sonardyne engineer was present for the initial shallow water shake-down and after a review of the integration, the system was deployed.

Throughout, SPRINT software was used to monitor the raw beam velocity data from the SPRINT-Nav’s integrated DVL, from which it was instantly obvious that all beams were achieving a good lock, even with the 30° pitch angle. It was also seen that the system continued to observe good data throughout the entire operation.


Throughout both the shallow water and deeper water cable lay operations, the SPRINT-Nav performed well and there was no performance degradation due to being mounted with a 30° pitch angle. On-board team members also found the topside software (SPRINT) intuitive and very useful while troubleshooting and tweaking the system.

As the environment was very new to Sonardyne (low speed, jerking motion, high turbidity), we also collected a lot of very useful data, including DVL and INS data, which has already helped us to understand how we can further improve the set up for these and similarly challenging applications.

We thank UTEC and DeepOcean for supporting this trial and look forward to providing this solution on future projects. If you would like any further information or want to know more about our SPRINT-Nav, get in touch.